The woman's mother said the boys "'do need to be taught a lesson because if they do it to her, they could do it to somebody else."
Unfortunately, the time to teach boys and girls lessons of non-violence and mutual respect is BEFORE crimes occur. If the boys had been reading the websites of men's rights activists (MRAs) such as Bob Allen, they may have thought they were doing the girl a favor. On his website, Bob Allen states:
...sex almost never hurts any female regardless of circumstances and usually provides physical pleasure and emotional satisfaction. Even when taken by force she understands that a man has chosen her and risked his life perhaps for her female charms. She is likely going to brag about "my rapist" for years and years, because it’s a story about how powerful and desirable she was as a female.
Why do Men's Rights Advocates (MRAs) Continue to Support, Defend & Link to Bob Allen?
MRAs have daughters, younger sisters as well as sons & brothers whose lives can be ruined by the toxic lies of hate. As long as we allow pedophiles, sexual deviants and advocates of violence to preach their messages to our children, as long as we allow them to use "men's rights" and "freedom of speech" like rocks to slither under, it is all children - boys AND girls - whose suffering will never end.
Read how MRA Bob Allen advocates pedophilia and rape: Women & Little Girls Like Getting Raped . Your children could be.
Let's stop hate speech directed at children. SIGN OUR PETITION to get Bob Allen's hate blog removed from Blogger (Blogspot)
41 comments:
Ms. Steele's hatred never takes a break. Now she's spewing hate about little boys. Rape-hate mongers like Steele don't care who they destroy, even little boys. Men have sons as well as daughters, and know that our sons should not be sent to prison for the rest of their lives before they are even old enough to understand the evil of feminist hate. Something is very wrong with the evil of a feminist run society.
What happened to your "Prayer for Peace"? That didn't last even a week. Did you get tired of spewing hate? Or was the thought of destroying little boy children too much temptation for you to pass by?
According to the Associated Press, "Three boys, ages 8 and 9, were being held in a detention center on charges of kidnapping and raping an 11-year-old girl near a suburban apartment complex, officials said.
"Ms. Steele's hatred never takes a break. Now she's spewing hate about little boys. Rape-hate mongers like Steele don't care who they destroy, even little boys."
Oh, yeah, Bob, 'cause rape is just so great. Robin's really spewing hate on this one. How dare she say that little boys who have been accused of rape are little boys who have been accused of rape? Speaking out against rape done by little boys is wrong! Will the hatred never end?
Seriously: Are you crazy?
Interviews of the Police Chief and the Girl with her Mother raise some disturbing questions. One the alleged assault happened on Thursday. The girl told her mother on Saturday. She towers over the 9 year old by Two feet. Another Girl was present when it happened. The Accused Boy has a broken wrist.
There are questions of trying the Boys as Adults. So far no Forensic evidence has been released. Before we jump the gun here and do another Duke LaCrosse and call for the Castration of these boys. The evidence needs to be heard first.
The drum beat to convict them has already started. Feminists see Boys as future Rapists. And are even trying to modify young Males Brains to make them more docile.
It is possible that a crime occurred here. Possible. Let the evidence show if they are guilty and let the system work.
bob said: ...our sons should not be sent to prison for the rest of their lives before they are even old enough to understand the evil of feminist hate.
bob, if you care about young boys you'll delete your blog and stop spreading lies, such as your contention that rape makes young girls feel special, that they'll brag about being raped for the rest of their lives. Does it occur to you that young boys have access to your blog? At least make it password protected and age verified.
Rape is a terrible thing: I am a survivor myself. Just thinking out loud:
I hear stories like this and I raise my eyebrows. At 8 & 9, rape?, I don't buy it without SOLID evidence. An 8 year old isn't old enough to do the crime. Plus, at 8 most boys think girls are yukkie and wouldn't approach one. The thing just plain does not smell right.
We have seen adult women molest 8 year old boys and try to convince people that HE did it, many times we've seen that.
These boys would have to be incredibly damaged to actually commit a rape at that age. They would also have to be untreated survivors themselves. Both of those are safe bets given what we know.
I don't know. It just doesn't sound right, something isn't adding up.
-----------
Bob and Robin: There's something not right here and I do not know what it is. Carping and sniping at each other doesn't solve the problem whatever it is.
Also Robin: Trying to dump Bob's attitude onto the main MRA movement is sexist as well as wrong.
bob, if you care about young boys you'll delete your blog
Robin's REAL agenda.
jw said: Also Robin: Trying to dump Bob's attitude onto the main MRA movement is sexist as well as wrong.
jw: I have given MRAs every opportunity - implored them even - to disavow Bob's most repulsive statements as not representative of MRA views. Not a single one would do so. He is linked to by most of the standard MRA sites. I created the poll on whether MRAs condone violence, giving them a chance to clarify, and was vilified here and on antimisandry.com and called every vulgar insult they could come up with. This is not the usual haters like Mikee, bob and Masculist Man, this is KellyMac, yohan, that video surveillance MRA guy, Chris Key... Some of them call mikee a psycho, but won't say anything about bob or MM.
That Khankrumburger guy said the MRM is "a big tent" and can only conclude that tent will not exclude those espousing rape, violence and hate. Of course, not ALL espouse that, but they won't exclude those who do. In my opinion, that's the Achilles Heel that will keep MRAs from being validated by anyone but themselves.
If they hate mike why wouldn't they hate bob too? This is strange. They do hate mike and are happy that you got his blog deleted. Can you comment on this.
If they hate mike why wouldn't they hate bob too? This is strange.
I can only speak about myself.
I have no idea, who is 'Bob Allen' and who is 'Masculist Man' - I never had any contact with these 2 persons.
MikeeUSA however was posting in a MRA-related forum, where I have moderator rights and MikeeUSA was signing up with various names and highly questionable violent comments.
Administrators and moderators tried to talk to him, but he was using also vulgar slogans against male and female forum-members in return and as far as I know all his nicknames are now banned.
'Bob Allen' 'Masculist Man' are not our forum-members - at least not using these nicknames. We do not tolerate all-out-women-hating postings in our forum.
----------
MRAs do not promote violence against women. However it should be noticed, that leading feminists in their literature glorify violence against men.
literarycritic: Speaking out against rape done by little boys is wrong! Will the hatred never end?
I wonder, how a 8 y.o. boy can 'rape' an 11 y.o. girl. Maybe you can explain ...
Not long time ago, a 4 y.o. boy was accused of sexual harassment.
Are hateful feminists not ashamed to target boys as young as 8 y.o. or even 4 y.o. and calling on them to be rapists and sex-offenders, only because they have the 'wrong' gender?
Hopefully, not the MRAs, but mothers with boys (= traitors of their own gender by feminist propaganda) will stand up and reject this slander against their sons.
robin Steele: I'd never heard of most of these names until I came here and I know a LOT of MRA's. You're casting a terrible wide net without any reason to do so.
Worse, far worse, you really must know that the women's movements have far more of a problem with demanding violence against men than the men's has with violence against women. Yet ... nothing!
This is always the way it is: Men are held to this impossible to meet standard while women get a free ticket to behave badly.
Look, no sane person sees hurting innocents as a solution to gender problems. There are people who are not-sane who do see violence as the solution. What you are supporting here is to catch all males in a net of not-sane while letting the FAR larger group of not-sane women go free. It is not good thinking: It is dangerous thinking and will lead to major problems.
It is EXACTLY what you are doing here that CAUSES these angry, distrustful and pro-violence men! I really do not see why that is so hard to understand.
Mrs Steele: The aformentioned men's movement is clearly happy to eat its own. Most of men who make up this movement ignore human psycology, know nothing of politics, and think that history does not repeat itself ad infinum. They try to silence their more radical supporters in hopes of gaining favor from the masses, when in reality the masses gravitate toward whatever the middle path is. Politics is also filled with compromise. The radical voices allow any movement to place the middle where it wants it to be placed.
The majority of the quisling men in the men's movement do not realise this or just hate the mikees and bobs and mascluinist men too much to care. They even support the imprisonment of these writers and rejoice when your efforts closed one of the websites of those men!
Why even bother with the men's movement, there has never been a successful one as they always eat their own. They are fools of the highest degree.
Let us all laugh at the Yohans and JWs of that movement. They can't even see how much they trip over themselves.
Titel of this thread:
Boys, 8 & 9, Charged with Rape.
MRAs Continue to Support Bob Allen.
What does Robin Steele really know about the Men's Rights Movement and its members?
Not much, I think. MRAs are simply said people (not all are men), who are concerned about men's rights.
This thread is related to a report about an 8 y.o. boy, who is accused of 'rape'.
I see nothing wrong about, if MRAs are showing up requesting an explication how it is possible for such a young boy, years away of his puberty, to rape a girl.
-----
Robin Steele:
You accuse all MRAs to support rape and assault, why do you not ask us some questions, why do you not verify if your accusations are true?
Ask MRAs, why they are MRAs, why they decided to become a member of this movement, ask them what is their intention, ask them about their problems...
We are not women-hating losers and we do not promote rape and assault, this is for sure.
Many of us MRAs are married, have children, are financial secure and do not have a criminal record.
Let us all laugh at the Yohans and JWs of that movement. They can't even see how much they trip over themselves.
November 22, 2007 6:20 AM
Of course this comment is anonymous, afraid to sign with his/her own name.
I feel sorry for this poor person, who is unable to carry out any meaningful dialog.
Yohan said Robin Steele:
You accuse all MRAs to support rape and assault, why do you not ask us some questions, why do you not verify if your accusations are true?
I did ask the question in the form of a poll. Yohan accused me of restarting my computer over and over to distort the results.
If MRAs are "not women-hating losers and we do not promote rape and assault," why do you link to Bob Allen's site, allow him on discussion boards that ban even moderate feminists, and won't directly disagree with his vile advocacy of pedophilia, rape and murder of police, all of which are clearly documented on this site?
How about a direct answer, Yohan? It will be a first?
@Robin Steele: I never said, that you purposely distort the results of this poll. I said, that everytime when I restart my computers I am allowed to vote again and again.
-----
I do not offer any link to 'Bob Allen' or 'Masculist Man', not inside my homepage, not in my blog. There is no connection to these 2 persons in the MRA-forum where I have moderator rights. I did not even know about these two persons, until you told me about their existence.
MikeeUSA is known to me and to many MRAs in our forum or elsewhere for his troll-like postings - he is banned.
MRA-related discussion boards do not block users only because they consider themselves as 'feminists'. At least not in our MRA-forum. And also not at antimisandry.com, where I post a comment sometimes.
To delete, edit, close threads, ban users, belittle them etc.. is the feminist style of moderation to remove or distort uncomfortable questions.
MRAs have nothing to hide.
Please feel free to ask anytime.
Robin Steele said...
jw said: Also Robin: Trying to dump Bob's attitude onto the main MRA movement is sexist as well as wrong.
jw: I have given MRAs every opportunity - implored them even - to disavow Bob's most repulsive statements as not representative of MRA views. Not a single one would do so
Robin...this is certainly NOT true.
Have you not seen what these very people have said about me right here in your blog? Do you think they are saying this because I have supported them? Have you not read some of the things I have said about those who act like radical feminist have become the enemy they say they detest?
I know many MRA's that have been speaking out about this people. Glen Sacks has spoken out many times as well has others have.
As for these three boys, I too find it very hard to believe they attacked this girl. Her parents did not even know about it until one of her friends said something after she bragged about it. I think there is a high possibility that something did occur..but SHE was the one who initiated it.
Go about half way down on this page and see what we have said about Why Do Women Lie About Rape?
http://www.shatterdmen.com/Guestbook.htm
Also check this site out:
College Student Creates Campuswide Crime Alert over Double False Rape Accusation
http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/11/20/college-student-creates-campuswide-crime-alert-over-double-false-rape-accusation/
There is no question that a rape is very traumatic for the victim...but a false rape accusation is just as traumatic for its victim but there are many rape hot-lines but there are NO false rape accusation hot-lines although it is just as common as rape. A third of the men in prison for rape have been found NOT guilty by DNA and many have spent years in prison but even when it is proven that a woman lied about being raped, little if anything is done.
The Achilles Heel that will keep MRAs from being validated by anyone but themselves is not what you have stated but it is that our society has been hi-jacked by radical feminist propaganda and our main stream media are afraid of being called "misogynous" for simple things like exposing the truth that women are as violent as men. Many have gotten actual death threats, including Erin Pizzey, the founder of the first women's shelter when she exposed these women for being violent. Not only did they threaten her, but they threatened her children
Robin...these were not MRA's these were feminist that were threatening her. She had to cancel many speaking engagements because the police could not assure her protection.
Yohan said:
MRAs do not promote violence against women. However it should be noticed, that leading feminists in their literature glorify violence against men.
I agree with this 100%. I have pointed out some of this call for the reduction of the male population (how much more violent can you get) by feminist and you have said..NOTHING!
Anonymous said the MRA's "eat their own" I would rather see it as we police our own. We do hold each person accountable and responsible for their OWN actions...something most feminist groups no little about. The few that do are given death threats by their former colleagues...so I ask...who is it that eats its own?
JW, Shattered Men, Literary Critic, Yohan: Thanks for your thoughtful comments.
To clarify a few things: While I can have a sarcastic edge that comes out when I'm attacked by cretins, if you read through the site you will see that I state quite often that I am opposed to violence, period. Against men, women, boys & girls. I believe that the system governing parental rights is dangerously dysfunctional and that many fathers and their children suffer greatly - as do even the mothers who are allowed to use pfas, custody and child support for revenge or gameplaying. I am for justice, healing, peace within families - which can only occur when there's fairness to all parties involved, and when the children's welfare is the priority. A healthy relationship with both parents is critically important - and neither parent should be allowed to undermine the relationship of the other. A mother who teaches a child to hate or distrust a caring father is, in my opinion, guilty of child abuse.
Are those Feminist views? I don't know. I've never been involved with feminism. But I am attacked for the views of Feminism and assumptions made about my motives rather than what I am really saying. The Internet at times reduces us to 2D paper targets.
My perception is that in the 60s women's rights movement began addressing social and political issues related to women. They coalesced a well-organized movement with well-defined values, clearly defined goals, and rallied behind articulate and politically savvy leaders. This movement may have started in anger, emotion and indignation, but it was effective because of reason, clarity and unity of members. Perhaps they were too effective in some areas - and too much power was afforded to women prone to misusing it.
It's my perception that the "Men's Rights Movement" lacks that reason, clarity and unity of members. Many MRM "members" don't get involved until they've been personally wronged, and are bitter, angry and distrustful of all women. They are mostly just on the Internet to vent, not to work toward real progress. They might speak out against a loner like mikeeusa, but they will abide and link to haters like this Bob Allen, Masculist Man, and others to advocate rape, violence and murder under the guise of Men's Rights. What they're really advocating is Men's Revenge.
In my opinion, you will not get any support for your rational contentions until you separate the highly vocal, incendiary and irrational crazies from your ranks. Like it or not, they are the ones who get the attention, and who make discrediting the "MRM" and concept of "masculism" so darn easy for anyone who wants to marginalize your message.
I said: ...it was effective because of reason, clarity and unity of members.
Before I get jumped on for glorifying the Feminist agenda, I am not saying they were or were not RIGHT. I am saying that they succeeded because in the end they were able to construct reasoned and supported (not necessarily correct) arguments that real spokespeople - using their real names - could promote and defend.
Robin Steele: MRAs "eat their own" Yes/No?
Robin Steele said...
"While I can have a sarcastic edge that comes out when I'm attacked by cretins,"
Robin is attacked? Hello?
This whole blog is an attack on men who speak out against feminism. Steele is a lying feminist. She is the one who is attacking. In typical feminazi doublespeak she claims that her attacks on men are "being attacked." LOL! Lies and more lies.
Anonymous: This whole blog is an attack on men who speak out against feminism.
It should be noticed, that Robin Steele is providing a link to Ginmar's webpage.
Robin Steele is also posting at Ginmar's radical feminist board.
Ginmar for years is widely known as an openly men-hating radical feminist publisher.
Even feminist websites edited her postings or banned her.
Maybe Robin Steele can explain her own position...
Yohan, at times you seem to be capable of rational dialogue, unlike Mikee, Bob Allen & Masculist Man and their ilk. Why then do you fall back into their blind attack mode?
What's the point of insulting me based on some straw woman Feminist basis rather on things I actually say? What's the point of attacking the link to ginmar's blog when you know that I have three times as many links to MRA sites (Chris Key Men's Rights Board, Men's Rights Blog, and Men's Daily News) directly, and more prominently placed, above it. If you count the number of outbound links from this site to other sites, I'm sure it's at least 10:1 men's rights to feminist sites.
I am surprised to see, that radical Ginmar's blog is the only feminist link in your pages.
That's all.
You are claiming links from MRAs to MikeeUSA are derogatory for all women.
Let me say the same, links from feminists to Ginmar are derogatory for all men.
When a father and a mother are at war with one another, can either one actually win?
Not if they love their children, who are the casualties of these battles. The only true victory is when compromise and cooperation are acheived, and reason, forgiveness and unselfishness prevail over rage, violence and a need for revenge.
Yohan of Antimisandry.com says: We do not tolerate all-out-women-hating postings in our forum.
----------
MRAs do not promote violence against women...
No doubt Yohan believes that, or would not state it so plainly, so publicly. And that's the problem with MRAs. They see what they want to see. They do not wish to disagree with another moderator or a well-liked contributor even if they promote misogyny or violence. They do not want to get branded as a "pussy" or a "mangina" when their pals are in chest-pounding mode. The problem isn't that Yohan promotes misogyny or is pro-violence, it's that he won't take a firm stand when an Antimisandry.com moderator says: Do we support violence against women? Hmmm... well that depends.
Or when regular Antimisandry.com members states There is no Men's movement without misogyny or there are plenty of women out there who could use a good smacking around. or I propose an armed militia style force similar to the black panthers to be a visible part of the men's movement and... assasinating some of the worst misandrists(Mary Daly, rasa von werder)
Ms. Steele,
If you are an Attorney as you claim. You already know how case Law effects Judicial decisions. And you also know how Family Courts treat Fathers. For this reason Stephen Baskerville is urging US Men not to marry and not to have children.
Compromise? Just how is that exactly going to happen. When Women have the full weight and power of both the State and Federal Government behind them, and against Men? This is specious nonsense.
Only the uninformed believe that nonsense. What you are really saying is simple. "Men you have no rights. Surrender and as our Slaves you will be treated fairly." Personally I prefer Death to Slavery. And am planning to leave this Sex Prison for Men called the US.
Bill Maher no Right Wing Nutjob has a rant online. About how Feminized America has become. Anybody paying attention for the last four decades knows this already.
Men will only Marry and give up Freedom if there is a tangible benefit. If not then Marriage is Toast in the US. No amount of disinformation, lies, insults, shaming can force us to love you, respect you, or want a relationship with you. Enduring Relationships offer mutual benefits. And Women as Marc Rudov points out are more Sexual than Men. Want it more. Refuse to be without it.
More Straw Man arguments, more insults from an extremist Feminist like Ginmar. More Men laughing at your ridiculous and unfounded spoutings. And thinking wow if this is the best the Feminists can come up with? Then they are really in trouble.
Robin Steele: Yohan of Antimisandry.com says: We do not tolerate all-out-women-hating postings in our forum.
This must be a misunderstanding, I post only occasionally at Antimisandry.com. -
I am a moderator of another fairly big and busy MRA-website.
However 'Antimisandry.com' does not support censorship and is a moderate MRA-website.
It is up to you to sign up there even as a feminist and to complain to the moderators, if you find a posting which is promoting violence or rape against all women.
----------
About assault/rape I made the following posting at Antimisandry.com on 14th November 2007:
While such a radical outsider like Jeff Fecke is glorified by feminists for his hateful derogatory remarks against men, I recommend that MRAs should not be supportive to men like MikeeUSA, whose postings are often promoting hate against all women.
His comments are disturbing for the MRA.
MRAs reject feminist demands - we are talking back to feminist slanders.
MRAs are not a women-hating group, we want to come along with women in a nice and fair way. We are straight men and appreciate contacts with straight women.
Yohan
What else can I say?
Today again, MikeeUSA, who entered antimisandry.com using a new nickname was banned for his aggressive comments.
What else can moderators at Antimisandry.com do by your opinion?
Yohan is a faggot mangina. He doesn't even see much wrong with the rapex device. "If she want's to wear it, OK".
"What else can moderators at Antimisandry.com do by your opinion?"
Lol. Yohan wishes to appease women's rights supporters.
Yohan said: What else can moderators at Antimisandry.com do by your opinion?
Mikee is an easy target as he arrives with a "kick me" sign on front and back. He's a loner and goes out of his way to offend everyone on every side - go figure.
It's a little tougher when its regular members. Here are a few Examples
And I don't think it's up to the moderators alone. I think it's a problem of MRAs being able to say: We don't tolerate hatespeech or advocate violence against anyone - no matter what our opponents do. This Masculist Man tries to claim he's the leader of the MRAs and Bob Allen no MRAs speak out against Bob Allen - whose pro-rape and pro-violence advocacy is well-documented here. I think that those of you who are serious about changing things need to distance yourself from those who just want to pound their chests and rant & rave.
Anonymous said: Yohan is a faggot mangina... Lol. Yohan wishes to appease women's rights supporters.
Mikee, seriously, turn off your computer & go seek some help. I am just going to start deleting your posts, for your own good.
How long can you go on with the sole ambition of annoying the most people possible and breaking your previous record for most asinine comments made in a single day?
Go ahead now, the adults are talking. Shoo!
If you read these two anonymous comments above your posting...
this is MikeeUSA or some other crazy guy/grl (not sure about the gender).
You decided to keep these 2 postings, this is about what most MRA moderators are also doing.
There are always people claiming to be a 'leader' of something.
I let them talk, they do not enjoy much support and within the MRAs, these are a few outsiders.
Hateful radical feminism against men however became an overall accepted movement of women in USA, and to some extent within the English speaking area.
This makes me worried.
This thread is a good example for men-hating laws (regardless the age) in USA. Nowhere in this world you will find a law, which makes it possible to charge an 8 y.o. boy for rape and sentence him as an adult for life in prison.
MRAs want such a law to be changed.
For radical feminists however like Ginmar, JackGoff and JeffFecke to change such a law means to support rape and assault against women.
I still have no idea or information, how an 8 y.o. boy is able to 'rape'. However this boy is still not released...considered as guilty solely out of the accusation of an 11 y.o. girl.
Feminists remain silent, not much to read on their websites about, are boys second class children in the USA?
Yohan said: You decided to keep these 2 postings, this is about what most MRA moderators are also doing.
No, I spoke out strongly and immediately against them, voiced my opposition to them, which is what MRAs - moderators or not - do not do. Can you see the difference?
According to some reports the whole encounter was the GIRL's idea. She was OLDER than the boys, knew more about sex, and told them what to do.
Naturally the feminists arrest and persecute boys for "rape" becasue boys are boys.
Evil is ruling our land.
Like the Duke LaCrosse case the Feminists are already prepared to Hang the Boys. Before any evidence is heard. And before any Forensic information is presented. That they are accused is enough for them. That the Innocence Project has freed over 200+ Men wrongfully convicted does not matter to the FemNags. Who use Rape accusations to destroy Men. Like a club to beat Men into submission.
What is shocking Women in the US. Is their rejection by a growing number of Men unwilling to put their heads in a Noose anymore. This is the true intent of Feminists to create Mistrust and hatred between Men and Women.
That some Men are more outspoken in their anger and refuse to compromise, means they are expressing themselves their way. While I may disagree with their viewpoints. I understand where they come from. And they have legitimate complaints that are being ignored.
Dr. Helen has posted her response to Men losing their Civil Rights. It is a measured and thoughtful review of where Gender relations are headed in the US. Which Men are now finally joining the Gender War and firing back. Women are shocked at the anger they are seeing. Its about Damn time Men grow a Spine. And refuse to be shit on by our Women.
As Anonymous said in the above comment, men are getting the message, they are better informed about the law, they are angry, disappointed and mistrusting.
However this thread is about an 8 y.o. boy accused for rape...some while ago.
What happened with this boy after his arrest?
He has a right for a lawyer? Can he pay for legal defense and experts? Is he considered to be an adult and sentenced to jail for years? What kind of evidence is against him? Any DNA or is he accused to rape while using a condom?
It is ridiculous and shameful!
Interesting the silence of all women...is there no mother out there in USA? Only feminists left over, who consider an 8 y.o. boy as worthless because of his gender?
Can Christ save "Robin Steele"?
Hate leads straight to hell, and Robin Steele's "womenofsteele" blog is pure hate.
In order for Robin Steele to be saved she would have to renounce her hate, repend for her sins, and
make restitution to those who she has harmed.
Don't look for Robin Steele to end her sins of hate any time soon. Christ can not save a misandrist
feminist. Straight to hell is where she belongs.
"I think it's a problem of MRAs being able to say: We don't tolerate hatespeech or advocate violence against anyone - no matter what our opponents do."
So what do we do if we refuse to recognize such a thing as "hatespeech" Robin? What if we recognize such law as to be the "thought control" it really is? What if we KNOW that by defining things in feminists terms, we allow them the power to define OUR movement?
What you seem to fail to understand is that men in general are VERY close to being pushed too far...
Now, I don't know if you've ever seen what happens when a normally level-headed guy is pushed to violence (as in a bar fight for instance), but usually it's explosive and unreasoning. This is usually a matter of trying to hold his temper until he JUST CAN'T HOLD IT ANYMORE. That is, collectively, pretty close to where we are in society with a lot of men. People that "just can't hold it in anymore" lash out - violently - and I am pretty hard pressed to find an instance of this where the antagonistic person didn't deserve the drubbing they took. Difference between a guy and a girl? The guy will admit he deserved it the next day, usually a girl will use the incident to get attention. Men do not generally use attention-seeking behaviour, and when they do it's CERTAINLY not victim-oriented. THAT is what leads to "never getting laid".
WWI was started with a single "political assassination", this led to millions of dead men in trenches all over Europe, as well as a second world war. I don't know about you, but it's pretty easy to see there was more to it than one politician/prince, right?
Well, those types of tensions are VERY present in our current society. Men are belittled, and demonized, and being compared to Nazi Germany is fast becoming par for the course for western societies. Men recognize what is going on, they just don't know it's OK to speak up yet. Do you blame the Jews for being powerless in Nazi Germany BTW?
When men speak up, though, women really better start being fair. Because that "nice guy at the bar" is running out of temper control.
I know this seems like a threat, and frankly, it is. It's not that I am threatening, I'm merely pointing out what is right in front of your face. DO NOT make the mistake of assuming men will continue on like they have for the last 4 decades. We won't...that's a guarantee.
What Ms. Steelrrhoid fails to comprehend is that it's not up to the femiNazi to tell MEN what to do and say. The femiNazi have worked hard to dominate, control, and censor MEN for decades, and fembitches like Steelrrhoid still believe that MEN have to do what she tells us. But it's a whole new day. MEN no longer listen to evil fembitches. MEN say what we need to say about the evil that has spread such hate and destruction across our land.
The words MEN speak are not up to you, Steele. Deal with it.
Let's talk about this so-called "rape" by little boys.
The facts of the case are becoming public. It seems that TWO older and MUCH BIGGER horney girls (age 11) took 3 younger boys (8 & 9) into the woods and molested (raped) them.
When knowledge of the rapes became public, the blue gun thugs arrested the victims, the little boys, because they are male. The blue gun thugs are the femiNazi army and their job is to destroy boys and men. They will not arrest the little bitches who raped the younger and much smaller boys.
The feminazi like Steelrrhoid have a field day pointing to little boys as "rapists."
Stories like this one, of violent females and their violent criminal army in blue raping and destroying even little boys make us MEN all the more glad to celebrate International Marc Lepine Day upcoming next week.
do my homework or sleep purchase college essay biology unit 5 essay help community service essay college
Post a Comment